Significant action already taken to combat conflicts of interest, says EFSA

EFSA says it has already made significant changes to prevent future conflicts of interests arising, but adds that it will give ‘careful and detailed consideration’ to new recommendations made by the EU Ombudsman.

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) said that the European Ombudsman has already acknowledged the ‘significant action’ it has taken to strengthen rules and procedures regarding staff members leaving the authority since the beginning of a ‘revolving doors’ case dating back to 2008 was taken to the Ombusdman.

EFSA told us that the Ombudsman had already specifically highlighted that it has already taken action to ensure that if a similar case arises in the future, it:

Case History

The case involved Dr Suzy Renckens, who formerly headed up the EFSA unit responsible for the risk assessment of genetically engineered plants. However, after five years at the EU agency, Renckens took up the post of regional manager for biotechnology regulatory affairs at Syngenta - a company that produces and markets GM plants.

The complaint arose after a German non-profit group (Testbiotech) complained about EFSA's handling of the move - specifically expressing concern that Renckens took up her post at Syngenta less than two months after leaving EFSA, which had not implemented any 'cooling off' period or further conditions to the move despite the fact that it had powers to do so.

  • obtains sufficient information including a precise description of the proposed new employment, and information concerning possible links between the new and the previous employment,
  • proceeds with an assessment that is as thorough as possible,
  • and properly records the results of its assessment.

“With a view to the future, the Ombudsman has made some recommendations to which EFSA will now give careful and detailed consideration as part of its cycle of continuous review and improvement of its independence system,” said EFSA in an email to us.

“EFSA will follow up with the Ombudsman as to whether these can underpin further improvements to its current Policy on Independence and Scientific Decision-Making Processes,” it said – adding that policy on independence and scientific decision making have been recognised by recent audits and independent evaluations as ‘highly developed and effective’.

The scientific agency added that it also plans to include the Ombudsman’s report and its recommendations in upcoming discussions with stakeholders – including NGOs.

“While EFSA’s standards of openness and transparency in its scientific processes are already very high, EFSA has pledged to improve them further through a recently launched transparency initiative.”