In the first look at the molecular diversity of the starch pathway in maize, researchers at the North Carolina State University have found that - in contrast to the high amount of diversity in many of the maize genes previously studied - there is a general dearth of diversity in this particular pathway.
"This is important because molecular diversity essentially provides scientists and plant breeders the raw materials to make the crop better,"said Dr Ed Buckler from the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) and one of the study's lead researchers.
"Starch is the main product of maize, and is one of the pathways we want to change the most," Buckler said. "People want to use corn for sweeteners, ethanol production and processed food needs. But some of the genes in the starch pathway cannot be manipulated any more by normal breeding."
In an interesting side note to the research on diversity in maize's starch pathway, the team also conclusively identified the single nucleotide - or structural unit of a nucleic acid - responsible for the production of sweet corn in the United States. Previous research by Dr Martha James at Iowa State University had narrowed the possibilities down to two nucleotides, according to Buckler. Sweet corn was one of the first mutations discovered in the field of genetics; that discovery occurred about 100 years ago, said Buckler.
"Currently, the identification of the US sweet corn mutation is of historical and basic research interest, but in the future it could help lead to a sweet corn with a good balance of sweetness, creaminess and germination ability," Buckler said.
According to Buckler limited diversity in starch and perhaps other, yet-to-be-studied maize pathways make it harder for plant breeders to increase yields of the popular crop. Therefore, to further increase yields, diversity of these important pathways must also be increased.
He adds that there are essentially three ways to solve the problem of low diversity in maize's starch pathway: crossing maize with pollen from its wild relative, teosinte; searching for and extracting important genetic material from Latin or South American maize; or using transgenics, or genetic engineering.
Each possibility's rewards come with risks, however. Teosinte's yield is not very high, so crossing it with maize would not be immediately useful, searching for diversity in "foreign" maize may not yield the necessary genetic diversity to improve US maize, and genetic engineering is often met with resistance, especially from consumers.
In the paper, Buckler and his colleagues suggest an alternative. "One efficient method may be to take alleles, or genetic variants, from selected genomic regions or genes in teosinte, which has lots of diversity, and incorporate them into maize," said Buckler, adding that this type of work has been done with the tomato and has yielded positive results.
Buckler and colleagues at NC Stateand the University of California, Irvine, published their findings in the 1 October issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.